Twitter Allows Marketers to Intervene, Facebook Doesn’t
If a customer or potential client talks about you on Facebook, can you avoid losing a sale?
No, not unless the customer is a part of your own conversation.
But if someone is talking smack about your brand or company of Twitter, you have that chance to join the conversation and steer the conversation in a more positive direction.
Here’s my quick, unintentional case study.
My wife and I went car-shopping on Saturday. We were interested in a Hyundai, but wanted to look at similar models at a Kia dealership down the street. I’m not familiar with the Kia, other than a few past rentals – and I can’t even remember if they were Kias.
But I figured my Facebook friends may know a thing or two about the Kia. I was hoping maybe some of those friends were checking out Facebook over a cup of coffee on a Saturday morning.
So before we left for the dealer, I posted a simple question as my status update:
Tim is going out car shopping. Anyone here ever have a Kia? I think I had one as a rental once.
And the comments? The included horror stories of a friend of a friend’s older Kia being held together by duct tape and zip ties. Another friend talked about her co-worker’s 10-year-old van needing work.
But the most intriguing from the word-of-mouth standpoint were the comments that told me to buy a Hyundai. I think three or four people spread their affinity for the other Korean automaker. And there were also shout-outs for Toyota and Mazda, as well as one to buy American.
Since I’m not Facebook friends with Kia, or any Kia representatives, Kia did not have a say in the conversation.
But if I had sent the update to my Twitter followers instead of my Facebook friends, Kia could have had a chance to win me over.
Why? There’s two big reasons:
- Twitter is searchable: Want to find out who is talking about you or your brand on Twitter? Use Twitter’s search function and Tweets about whatever you want to find will show up most recent first. In the Kia case, someone in marketing could have followed me and let me know about dealer incentives, or quelled any of the anecdotes about its older models.
- Facebook can be private: Even of you as a marketer were going to search “Kia” on Facebook, you’re going to come up with people who have the letters “kia” in their name first, and then groups for fans of the automaker. Even if you find out who owns or is a fan of Kia that way, that person’s Facebook profile may not be public. The marketer would have to become that person’s friend to find out if he or she is using status updates to spread good or bad news.
So as a merchant, what do you do? You have to monitor Twitter just as you would the blogosphere. If you have an employee keeping an eye out on what people are saying in cyberspace, make sure Twitter is a part of that activity.








July 28th, 2009 at 12:16 pm
Actually, I would think a story about a car so old that it has to be held together by duct tape but STILL running isn’t exactly horror. And a 10-year old van that made it that long? Most cars are made to be disposible these days (traded in every 3 years or they quit running in 5)…except for KIAs.
Nuff said about the brand but as a marketer, I think there have to be better ways than to spend every waking moment keeping track of who’s saying what on Twitter. And you can’t afford to spend money trying to find and rebut every bad comment out there about your brand. If you make and build a good product and a good brand, despite the occasional lemon, you will still come out on top. Most people go to social media and the web to complain, rarely to praise and so the nay-sayers of your brand on twitter probably represent the minority. And if you make a decision about a large ticket item like a car based on complainers on the web/Twitter instead of an educated decision based on research, shame on you.
July 28th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Thanks for pointing out a big marketing difference between Twitter and Facebook. I hadn’t thought of it like that before. It’s also easy to set up alerts with Twitter, so that when your company name or product is mentioned you can look into it as it is being said.
July 28th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
I disagree. Most people look to others for recommendations in addition to research, and as a consumer, I feel better knowing whether someone has had a good experience or bad one before I buy. In certain cases, I won’t buy a product or service without a recommendation from a friend, in addition to extensively researching the product. People who go to the web to complain do it to get a resolution or a response to their bad experience. The brand should respond and turn that experience into a positive one - it can work to their benefit and turn the naysayer into a fan.
July 29th, 2009 at 11:54 am
Sounds more like a branding issue than anything else. The primary flaw in the purchase cycle here is that the customer relied exclusively on an internal network as opposed to conducting what I would consider reasonable research (SEM) about a product.
To suggest an automotive manufacturer dedicate $$ to monitor tweets seems pretty far fetched. However, it might be feasible for a local dealership.